Question

The Structure of an Argument

Think of it this way, your ancestors navigated by the
stars, and today most people won't walk outside without
a GPS. That's a crazy loss of direction or skill at some
level for sure. And while Indigenous peoples and many
rural peoples can still see the stars, most of the world's
population cannot. That's particularly an urban thing,
where there's all this light. From my farm, through the
open skies, at night I can see the glow of Detroit Lakes,
and that's 25 miles away.
-"A Case for Waawaatesi,"
Winona LaDuke
Which statement best describes the point LaDuke is
making in the passage?
How does the writer appeal to the reader's logic?
How does the writer establish credibility?

Answer 1

LaDuke argues that modern reliance on technology has caused a loss of traditional navigation skills, using personal experience and logical reasoning to establish credibility and appeal to the reader.

Step-by-step explanation:

Winona LaDuke in the passage "A Case for Waawaatesi" is making a point about the loss of traditional navigation skills due to over-reliance on modern technology like GPS, and how this loss is more pronounced in urban areas with light pollution obstructing the view of the stars. LaDuke establishes credibility by mentioning personal observations from her farm, appealing to the reader's sense of heritage and the concrete example of light pollution's impact. The writer uses logical reasoning to connect the loss of these skills to the inability of urban dwellers to see the stars, suggesting a disconnection from indigenous and rural ways of living that remain closer to nature.