Question

Gordon and Brenda entered into a romantic relationship in June. They exchanged keys to one another’s apartments. Their relationship continued until December 31. Brenda’s feelings started to cool in October, and she told Gordon she wanted to be only friends. However, Gordon persisted in his advances. He gave Brenda presents, including a watch and the offer of a plane ticket to New Orleans.

Later, Gordon offered to renovate Brenda’s bathroom. She indicated that she would like this but could not afford to pay him for the work. In February, the renovations were completed. Afterward, Gordon claimed that Brenda had agreed to pay him what she could each month until the bill was paid, although he was not sure what that amount was. Brenda indicated to Gordon that their friendship was over and that he was to return the key.
After discovering that Brenda was seeing a friend of his, Gordon placed a claim on Brenda’s property for $759. The court was not certain as to what had been agreed between the parties, but the judge believed that Gordon had done the work in a bid for Brenda’s continued affection.

Was there a legally binding contract between the parties? Did Brenda have an obligation to pay Gordon for the renovations? Explain your answer with reference to the elements of a contract.

Answer 1

Answer: No there was not a legally binding contract between the parties and Brenda does not have an obligation to pay Gordon for the renovations.

Step-by-step explanation:

Brenda didn't sign any contract that agreed to her paying him money and she technically never agreed to Gordon renovating or paying Gordon. All she said was that she'd love it but can't afford to pay for it.