Question

According to the article, In 2002, Rhode Island had an advisory referendum

on whether citizens favored altering the state constitution to make all
three branches of government coequal.
Voters overwhelming voted yes, but the nonbinding referendum did not force legislators to act one way or
couple of short paragraphs, explain whether you think this type of referendum is useful and beneficial. What are the benefits of
the other. In a
having a direct, binding referendum? What are the drawbacks?

Answer 1

A referendum is a practice where electorates vote directly on any law or proposal in order to bring any policy to the nation.

What are the benefits of having a direct, binding referendum?

The practice helps the government to take any vital decision for making improvements in political issues and images. Thus, it eliminates non-constitutional acts of the governing parties.

What are the drawbacks of having a direct, binding referendum?

The major drawback would arise due to tyranny as the majority votes would result in satisfying certain political needs. Thus, with the loss of minority the power goes into the hands of ambitious people.