menu
QAmmunity.org
Login
Register
My account
Edit my Profile
Private messages
My favorites
Register
Ask a Question
Questions
Tags
Categories
Ask a Question
(1) The Court is of the opinion that Dred Scott is not a citizen of Missouri within the meaning of the Constitution and is not entitled to sue in its courts….. (2) The right of property in a slave is expressly
Insou
asked
Feb 21, 2022
22,028
views
7
votes
7
votes
(1) The Court is of the opinion that Dred Scott is not a citizen of Missouri within the meaning of the Constitution and is not entitled to sue in its courts…..
(2) The right of property in a slave is expressly affirmed in the Constitution. And the government is pledged to protect this right in all future time if the slaves escapes from his owner…..
(3) Upon these considerations, it is the opinion of the Court that the act of Congress which prohibited a citizen from holding and owning property of this kind [slaves] in the territory of the U.S. north of the line mentioned is not [permitted] by the Constitution and is therefore void.
Ruling of Justice Roger Taney, Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857)
Based on the excerpt, which conclusion can be drawn about Chief Justice Taney’s decision in the Dred Scott case?
a
Scott was a citizen of the United States.
b
By living in Missouri, Scott was no longer a slave.
c
Scott was considered as property that could not be taken from its owner.
d
The Missouri Compromise allowed Scott to bring a case to the Supreme Court.
History
middle-school
Insou
asked
Feb 21, 2022
by
Insou
2.6k
points
answer
comment
share this
share
0 Comments
Your comment on this question:
Email me at this address if a comment is added after mine:
Email me if a comment is added after mine
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Add comment
Cancel
Your answer
Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on:
Email me if my answer is selected or commented on
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Add answer
Cancel
2
Answers
11
votes
11
votes
C. Scotty was considered as property that could not be taken from its owner.
KBBWrite
answered
Feb 22, 2022
by
KBBWrite
2.8k
points
ask related question
comment
share this
0 Comments
Your comment on this answer:
Email me at this address if a comment is added after mine:
Email me if a comment is added after mine
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Add comment
Cancel
19
votes
19
votes
Answer:
yea i agree the answer is c
Step-by-step explanation:
Sachin Kulkarni
answered
Feb 25, 2022
by
Sachin Kulkarni
2.3k
points
ask related question
comment
share this
0 Comments
Your comment on this answer:
Email me at this address if a comment is added after mine:
Email me if a comment is added after mine
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Add comment
Cancel
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.
1.6m
questions
2.0m
answers
Other Questions
If a country or group of people do something to another country or group of people, does it affect the rest of the world? Did what King Leopold II do in the Congo affect the US? Does what the U.S. do to
Give me 3 important facts about the Jurassic Period. Thank you
What manufacturing industry did World War II MOST help establish in Texas? A) car manufacturing B) textile manufacturing C) airplane manufacturing Eliminate D) computer manufacturing
What generalization can you make regarding the geographic distribution of results?
Which of these is the most likely reason for the map to be called "The Fertile Crescent"? A. The highlighted land contained Mesopotamia where there were many babies born. B. The highlighted land is located
Twitter
WhatsApp
Facebook
Reddit
LinkedIn
Email
Link Copied!
Copy
Search QAmmunity.org