235k views
4 votes
Can someone pls help me with this?

Can someone pls help me with this?-example-1
User Sint
by
3.9k points

2 Answers

7 votes

Answer:

According to the web: "Some Westerners would deny that other cultures make art, so let’s start there. Among the reasons given for such a view are that other cultures lack a word for art, they do not create non-functional items that are for contemplation alone, and their traditions are conservative rather than innovative and rebellious. But these generalizations are false, both in what they assume about Western art and as they apply to the art of other cultures. Much Western art has been conservative and functional: consider medieval religious art and iconography. Some other cultures do have words that seem to correspond to “art.” In any case, one can make art without a term or even a concept for it. The people who made the first art certainly had specific goals in mind but could not have thought of what they made as art, not until the relevant public practice was locally established and eventually named. And many other literate cultures with strong religious or court traditions create non-functional art, intended for contemplation for its own sake, and surround this with elaborate theories and histories. Besides, I do not see why art cannot be functional, as already indicated. And finally, the art-making practices of other cultures sometimes value creative change as much as the Western avant-garde does. The claim is not that they have art if we call it that, or that the practices just mentioned are uniform across cultures. Other cultures have established their own, independent art traditions and conventions. The claim is, rather, that we can see that we share their conception of art because of what arts across the cultures have in common, notwithstanding their manifest differences. In tribal societies art might not be institutionalized as it is in the West; it might involve the active participation of most people in the group, and it might be closely connected to ritual. But these are not defeating differences. It makes as much sense to say they have art as to say they have cooking, clothing, marriage, and religion, though all of these might be distinguishable from their Western equivalents."

Step-by-step explanation:

WARNING: PLAGIARISM IS A REAL THING AND CAN AFFECT YOUR EDUCATION, THAT IS WHY I HAVE PLACED DOWN MY SOURCE SO THAT YOU DO NOT GET IN TROUBLE. DO NOT COPY THIS ANSWER WORD FOR WORD ON YOUR HOMEWORK. USE THIS AS A SOURCE, AND MAKE IT YOUR OWN:

file:///home/chronos/u-dea8109573ba7b5a6039413b3d46a0d3f788e17e/MyFiles/Downloads/1619-Article%20Text-5543-1-10-20180531.pdf

I hope my answer helped you! If you need more information or help, comment down below and I will be sure to respond if I am online. Have a wonderful rest of your day!

User Dominic
by
3.2k points
1 vote

Answer:

Cross Cultural Difference would often lead to different interpretations of differents arts. While in some cultures a peice or a style might mean one thing it could often mean something else to a different culture. this would often evolve the art or cross-cultured peice which would add more meaning and even would often lead to the cultures combining different peices creating new arts. One example is blues music. Blues was basically Slave Music untill it merged with white culture which then it became a culture in itself

User Yiannis Mpourkelis
by
3.7k points