Answer:
One reason to keep the Electoral College is that it ensures that all states, regardless of their population size, have a say in the election. Each state is awarded a certain number of electors, and in most states, the candidate who wins the popular vote in the state receives all of that state's electors. This means that smaller states have a proportionally larger say in the election, and ensures that candidates must campaign in a diverse range of states rather than just focusing on highly populated areas.
However, one reason to get rid of the Electoral College is that it can result in the candidate who wins the popular vote not becoming the president. This has happened several times in American history, most recently in the 2000 election, when Al Gore won the popular vote but lost the election to George W. Bush due to the way the electors were allocated. This can be seen as unfair, and some argue that the president should be the candidate who is preferred by the majority of voters.
If I could, I would get rid of the Electoral College. I believe that the president should be the candidate who is preferred by the majority of voters, and the current system doesn't always ensure that. I think that a national popular vote would be a more fair and democratic way of electing the president.
Step-by-step explanation: