Step-by-step explanation:
How does the Mendez v. Westminster case reflect what we have been learning about the trial and appeal process in class?
The Mendez v. Westminster case reflects what we have been learning about the trial and appeal process in class in several ways. First, the case demonstrates the importance of the appeals process in ensuring that justice is served. After the initial trial court ruled in favor of the school district, the Mendez family appealed the decision to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which ultimately reversed the lower court’s ruling and found in favor of the Mendez family. This shows how important it is for parties to have the opportunity to appeal a decision if they feel that the initial ruling was unjust.
Second, the case also reflects the importance of precedent in the appeals process. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals relied heavily on the precedent set by the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. Board of Education when it ruled in favor of the Mendez family. This demonstrates how important it is for courts to consider prior rulings when making decisions, as this helps to ensure that justice is served and that the law is applied consistently.