Answer:
The New York Times Co. V. US defended The New York Times constitutional Rights to freedom of press allowing them to report on things that the government didn't like.
However in Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart because the town of 850 was so small Stuart who was being tried for multiple murder charges wanted to not allow for press to be made untill after the case due to his right to an impartial jury.
SO Nebraska Press Association would be able to point to NY times V US to show that they have a freedom of press that supercedes that, because it is the jurys fault for becoming impartial.
Step-by-step explanation: