155k views
0 votes
In conclusion most people think that the more people have cars is better, it is not the case all the time because there are advantages and disadvantages. Public transportation also has advantages and disadvantages. There are three reasons for use of public transportation one advantage and two disadvantages, one advantage is faster commutes and two disadvantages are it can be crowded and long wait times.

Is this part good, let me know know if I need to make corrections, change/fix punctuation or add more detail?

If it doesn't make sense show me a proper way to write the conclusion sentence above?

User VicM
by
3.5k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Yours is perfectly fine, but I'd like to add some punctuation and add a few more lines for your help. I hope it satisfies you!

"Even though private cars are chosen over public transport, and, private cars can take us to our destination in half the time, an increase in the number of cars is not eco-friendly. Cars require fossil fuels, which take millions of years to form and can take seconds to use. When fossil fuels are burnt, they produce harmful gases which damage the ozone layer and are one of the major causes for climate change and global warming.

There are also pros and cons for public transport. It's affordable and also environment friendly since the number of fossil fuels being used will reduce. However, public vehicles can be very crowded and have long wait times.

The conclusion we draw here is that most people prefer having private cars/vehicles over public transport."

I tried my best, good luck!! :3

User Brynn McCullagh
by
3.4k points