Final answer:
The author's purpose of 'Good Vegan, Bad Vegan' is to persuade and inform on the complexities of vegan diets and their environmental impact. Jane E. Brody uses contrasting viewpoints from sources like Quartz and BBC to challenge common beliefs and advocate for sustainable food systems. The audience is those interested in health, diet, and environmental sustainability.
Step-by-step explanation:
The author's purpose of the article Good Vegan, Bad Vegan by Jane E. Brody appears to be to persuade and inform the audience. The main idea is to examine the benefits and potential downsides of vegan diets, in contrast with the general pro-vegetarian stance of most sources. The article presents a viewpoint that challenges the common perception that veganism is always beneficial for humanity and the environment. The context of the article is the current global practices in food production, processing, and distribution, and the author's perceived need for sustainable food systems that minimize environmental impact. The intended audience is likely those interested in diet, health, and environmental issues. By citing sources such as Quartz and BBC, the author uses information from these outlets to support her opinion and convince readers by presenting facts and alternate perspectives.
Lily Tran's thesis that "The human race must turn to sustainable food systems that provide healthy diets with minimal environmental impact, starting now" provides a clear statement of purpose for the article. The author likely decided to write it to contribute to the ongoing dialogue about food sustainability and the role of veganism within that conversation. By discussing pieces like Chase Purdy's Being Vegan Isn't as Good for Humanity as You Think and Richard Gray's Why the Vegan Diet Is Not Always Green, the author uses specific techniques to present the complexities of the issue, which may have varying degrees of success in persuading the reader based on their prior beliefs and knowledge.