7.2k views
3 votes
What evidence from the passage supports the author's bias against opponents of aquaculture?

The author chooses to call the opponent's reasons “downsides” in the heading, which shows that she is “putting them down.”


The author includes a chart that shows the United States is lagging in aquaculture, which suggests that fish farming is unsafe.


The author uses the term “destroy the aesthetic beauty,” which makes the reader think the fish farms are ugly.


The author compares farmed fish to Frankenstein, which makes the fish seem like monsters and makes fun of the opponent's fears.

User Outcassed
by
4.9k points

2 Answers

5 votes
The answer is B- the author includes a chart that shows the United States is lagging in aquaculture, which suggests that fish farming is unsafe
User Eronn
by
4.9k points
4 votes

Answer:

The evidence from the passage that supports the author's bias against opponents of aquaculture is:

The author chooses to call the opponent's reasons “downsides” in the heading, which shows that she is “putting them down.”

Step-by-step explanation:

User Dko
by
4.7k points