Answer:
In explanation below.
Explanation:
Presumably, the proof you have in mind is to use a=b=2–√a=b=2 if 2–√2√22 is rational, and otherwise use a=2–√2√a=22 and b=2–√b=2. The non-constructivity here is that, unless you know some deeper number theory than just irrationality of 2–√2, you won't know which of the two cases in the proof actually occurs, so you won't be able to give aa explicitly, say by writing a decimal approximation.