5.0k views
1 vote
Read the excerpt from "On Women’s Right to Vote” by Susan B. Anthony.

Webster, Worcester, and Bouvier all define a citizen to be a person in the United States, entitled to vote and hold office.

The only question left to be settled now is: Are women persons? And I hardly believe any of our opponents will have the hardihood to say they are not. Being persons, then, women are citizens; and no state has a right to make any law, or to enforce any old law, that shall abridge their privileges or immunities. Hence, every discrimination against women in the constitutions and laws of the several states is today null and void, precisely as is every one against Negroes.

What kind of reasoning does Anthony use to claim that women deserve the same rights as men?

inductive reasoning
deductive reasoning
abductive reasoning
argumentative reasoning

HELP PLEASE HELP

User Gnarf
by
4.3k points

1 Answer

0 votes

Answer:

argumentative reasoning

Step-by-step explanation:

I'm pretty sure it's correct as it takes an aggressive approach and it's biased, it's an opinion so arumentaive should be correct.

User Lucascaro
by
4.8k points