Final answer:
Kennedy's potential distortion of evidence is suggested by his public support for the working class contrasted with private dismissal of such issues and his exaggeration of the threat of Communism for political advantage.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question explores the veracity of President John F. Kennedy's reasoning by identifying distortions in his evidence. Two details that signal Kennedy might be distorting evidence in his reasoning include:
- The discrepancy between his public persona as a supporter of the working class and his private dismissal of domestic issues like minimum wage in favor of international affairs, specifically the threat of Communism.
- His campaign attacks on the Eisenhower administration for being soft on Communism, despite Nixon's involvement in a secret operation against Fidel Castro's Cuba, which Kennedy himself proposed to do if he were elected, showing a potential manipulation or exaggeration of facts for political gain.
These instances highlight a contrast between John F. Kennedy's public statements and his private views or actions, suggesting a distortion of evidence to support his arguments or bolster his image.