Final answer:
Cultural relativism asserts that morality is relative to the cultural context, making the statement true. Normative Ethical Relivism claims there are no universal moral principles, with moral codes varying by society. Despite cultural diversity, some ethical principles, like the wrongness of unjustified killing, may be universally recognized.
Step-by-step explanation:
Cultural relativism in moral philosophy is the notion that morality is relative to its cultural context. This statement is True. Cultural relativism suggests that what is considered moral or immoral can vary significantly from one culture to another. This is a concept that has been supported by evidence from cultural anthropologists who have observed the diverse moral codes and practices across different societies.
Normative Ethical Relativism is a theory within this realm that postulates there are no universal moral principles applicable across cultures. Instead, it argues that moral rightness and wrongness of actions are culture-specific and that the predominant views within a given society cannot be rightly criticized by outsiders or even minorities within that society, as these views are inherently correct in their specific cultural context.
There are challenges associated with normative ethical relativism, particularly when it comes to universal principles that many cultures might agree upon, such as the basic right to life. While there may be differences in how cultures justify certain acts, there seems to be some consensus on underlying moral principles, such as the wrongness of unjustified killing. This suggests that while cultural relativism acknowledges the diversity of moral perspectives, it does not necessarily preclude the existence of some universal ethical standards.