Step 1
We will consider the Time(min) and distance (km) covered by Ken on his bike on Monday from the table given
From the Monday table
1) The time increases by a constant unit of 20 mins as seen below

2) The distance however, does not increase by a constant unit as seen below

Therefore, the relationship in Monday's table cannot be described by a constant unit rate since the time and distance individually do not increase by a constant unit.
Step 2
From Tuesday's table, we can deduce that
1) The time increases by a constant unit of 20 mins

2) The distance increases by a constant unit of 4km as seen below
![\begin{gathered} 8-4=4\operatorname{km} \\ 12-8=4\operatorname{km} \\ 16-12=4\operatorname{km} \\ 20-16=\text{ 4km} \end{gathered}]()
Since, both the time and distance individually increases by a constant unit, we can therefore conclude that the relationship in Tuesday's table can be described by a constant unit rate.