Answer:
Economic expansion is not what is causing the climate crisis; rather, the lack of effective public policy meant to lower greenhouse gas emissions is to blame. As long as regulations are in place to limit the environmental effects of the goods and services we produce and use, there is no conflict between capitalism and environmental protection. With those regulations in place, consideration for environmental sustainability can and will be factored into every decision made by the private, nonprofit, and governmental organizations from which we all benefit.
The sustainability of the environment is not affected in the same way by all consumption patterns. The emergence of more sustainable lifestyles can be seen in consumption trends. Young Americans, for instance, don't seem as interested in buying cars as their parents and older siblings did. The advancement of the mobile phone has made ride-sharing, bike-sharing, and other transit options possible.
However, taking an Uber or driving your own car are both considered economic activities for the purposes of calculating GDP. These consumption patterns are typically not the subject of policymaking because they are quite influenced by shifting social norms than by governmental action. The only exceptions might be behavior that directly harms other people, like drinking and driving or smoking in public. New technologies can also lessen the impact of consumption on the environment.
Ironically, some environmentalists and some deniers of global warming share the view that environmental protection and economic growth must be compromised. Both can and must be done. Because most people in the developed world enjoy their way of life and won't give it up, we cannot stop investing in economic development. Environmental advocates will fail politically if they make such a request.
Step-by-step explanation:
Political and business leaders may not care if economic growth harms the environment, and environmentalists may disagree, contending that neither economic growth nor environmental harm can coexist.
Even by itself, environmental protection promotes economic expansion. The air pollution control technologies we install on power plants and automobiles are made and sold by a third party. Additionally, environmental amenities are valuable.