Register
Which of the following describes an advantage primary sources have over secondary sources for a historian?
35.4k views
3 votes
Which of the following describes an advantage primary sources have over secondary sources for a historian?

User Mhluzi Bhaka
by
7.6k points

1 Answer

12 votes

Answer:

Primary sources are usually firsthand accounts of the certain incident, and can contail details that secondary sources may miss.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Amu
by
7.9k points
← Prev Question Next Question →

No related questions found

Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.5m questions

12.2m answers

Other Questions

What goal of the constitution was also a goal of the Magna Carta?
is it true or false that after the american revolution conflicts in the northwest territory erupted between remaining british soldiers and native americans
Who made dutch claims in north america?
What were the positive and negative effects of Egypt being imperialized by Britain.
What military strategy defeated Cornwallis at Yorktown?
Link Copied!