Answer:
Each of the question is explained briefly below.
Step-by-step explanation:
1. Did the authors have similar or opposing views?
Answer: The authors have opposing views.
Explanation: The authors Alexander fisher and Juniper Springs, have opposing views about human colonization to Mars. Where the former explains about the technological growth and the advantages of using them to move to a second planet. The latter says that, instead of spending a huge sum of money to an unstable plant, we can spend the same money to restore the stability of the earth. Hence this clearly explains the opposing views between the authors.
2. Did the authors use the same points of comparison? Explain with examples. The authors use
Answer: The authors use same points of comparison.
Exaplanation: For example, the authors compare about radiations in the Mars' atmosphere. They also compare in terms of money. In general, whatever the points are explained were opposed by the latter author.
3. Did the authors support their views in the same or different ways?
Answer: The authors did not support, in any way, about the views.
Explanation: The authors did neither in terms of same or different ways of their opinion. They completely oppose each other.
4. Did both focus most on appeals to logic or to emotion?
Answer: Both focus on appeals to logic.
Explanation: The authors Alexander fisher and Juniper Springs focus on appeals to logic as they did not use any kind of emotional statement to claim their stand while discussing about colonizing in Mars.