459,132 views
3 votes
3 votes
LOOK AT POINTS HURRY PLEASE

Read the excerpt below:

Plans to end segregation were failing. Then, another minister, James Bevel, came up with a new plan: fill the jails with children, he said. Unlike their parents, children wouldn’t lose their jobs by protesting.

QUESTION:
What are two opposing positions two writers might take on James Bevels decision to begin children’s protests? Describe each position along with at least one reason supporting it.

LOOK AT POINTS HURRY PLEASE Read the excerpt below: Plans to end segregation were-example-1
User Sunadorer
by
2.5k points

2 Answers

22 votes
22 votes

Answer:Two positions writers might take on James's decision would be to agree or disagree with putting children in jail. "I disagree that children should be jailed during protests because they are minors and would have no fair prosecution." Or alternatively "I agree with putting children in jail during protests because the children wouldn't loose a societal position like a job, and there would be no loss for the economy

Step-by-step explanation:

User Liker
by
3.1k points
10 votes
10 votes

Answer:

Two positions writers might take on James's decision would be to agree or disagree with putting children in jail. "I disagree that children should be jailed during protests because they are minors and would have no fair prosecution." Or alternatively "I agree with putting children in jail during protests because the children wouldn't loose a societal position like a job, and there would be no loss for the economy"

Step-by-step explanation:

User Artem Volkhin
by
3.1k points