Register
Should the constitution have been ratified without the bill of rights?
501,934 views
1 vote
1 vote
Should the constitution have been ratified without the bill of rights?

User Veky
by
2.4k points

2 Answers

14 votes
14 votes
Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government.
User HPringles
by
3.4k points
19 votes
19 votes
.......................No
User Mrshickadance
by
3.4k points
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

1.6m questions

2.0m answers

Other Questions

Soon after a volcano becomes an island, coral reefs start growing around its edges. These reefs are called a. barrier reefs b. fringing reefs c. artificial reefs
The powers of the federal government are A. explained in the Constitution. B. decided by the states. C. protected in the Bill of Rights. D. shared by state governments.
The department that oversees the application of antitrust laws and environmental and civil rights issues and runs the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Drug Enforcement Administration is the _____.
What two developments changed life in preindustrial societies?
6.4 List two issues in sports that can disturb the implementation of nation-building​
Link Copied!