147,163 views
37 votes
37 votes
Which of the following is a valid judgment of the year 2000 presidential election?

A) If the recount had happened in Texas instead of Florida, no delay in naming the winner would have been necessary.
B) If the recount had happened in Alaska instead of Florida, no delay in naming the winner would have been necessary.
C) If the recount had happened in New York instead of Florida, no delay in naming the winner would have been necessary.
D) If the recount had happened in California instead of Florida, no delay in naming the winner would have been necessary.

Which of the following is a valid judgment of the year 2000 presidential election-example-1
User Steinar Herland
by
2.5k points

2 Answers

27 votes
27 votes

Answer:

D) If the recount had happened in California instead of Florida, no delay in naming the winner would have been necessary.

Step-by-step explanation:

I got it "Correct"

User Tejas Tank
by
2.3k points
9 votes
9 votes

Answer:

D) If the recount had happened in California instead of Florida, no delay in naming the winner would have been necessary.

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope this will help

User Frantz
by
2.8k points