24,100 views
12 votes
12 votes
Select the correct answer.

Matthew underwent a criminal trial on the charge of kidnapping. At the end of the trial, the jury declared Matthew Innocent because there was
not enough evidence to prove his guilt. Which clause of the Fifth Amendment bars the prosecution from taking Matthew to trial again for the
same crime?
A. Equal Protection Clause
B. Self-Incrimination Clause
c. Double Jeopardy Clause
D. Due Process Clause
PLZ HELP 20 POINTS

User Zjames
by
3.0k points

1 Answer

19 votes
19 votes

Answer:

C. Double Jeopardy Clause.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution provides a number of rights that a person has dealing with both civil as well as criminal proceedings. This Amendment included the "Self-Incriminatory Clause, Double Jeopardy Clause, and the Due Process Clause" among others.

In the case of Matthew, the Double Jeopardy Clause bars the prosecution from carrying out another trial on Matthew's case for the second time. This clause states that "No person shall . . . be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb . . . . " This means that a person cannot be tried more than once for the same crime.

Thus, the correct answer is option C.

User Thomas B Preusser
by
2.6k points