Question

Read the paragraph.

With car crashes being the leading cause of death among teenagers, many are in favor of raising the legal driving age to eighteen. According to the National Highway Safety Administration, the rate of crashes, both fatal and nonfatal, for sixteen-year-old drivers is almost ten times the rate as that of drivers aged thirty to fifty-nine, as calculated per mile driven. No one disputes the idea that raising the legal driving age will create issues and difficulties for many; however, these issues pale in comparison with the issue of safety. "The bottom line is that when we look at the research, raising the driving age saves lives," states Adrian Lund, president of the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, a research group funded by the auto insurance industry. To date, New Jersey is the only state to raise the legal driving age to seventeen, and various studies have shown that the overall rate of teen fatalities linked to automobile accidents has been consistently lower compared to that of nearby states.

A student is researching evidence to support the claim below.
Some people believe that raising the legal driving age to eighteen in the United States would cause a wealth of problems for society, but the benefits of doing so far outweigh the potential inconveniences.

What kind of evidence does the passage include to support this claim? Check all that apply.

a firsthand account
a quote from an expert
facts and statistics
a personal feeling
relevant examples

Answer 1

The passage includes facts and statistics, a quote from an expert, and relevant examples to support raising the legal driving age, which underscores the argument that safety benefits outweigh inconveniences.

Step-by-step explanation:

The passage includes several types of evidence to support the claim that the benefits of raising the legal driving age to eighteen far outweigh the potential inconveniences. One form of evidence present is facts and statistics from the National Highway Safety Administration about the high rate of crashes among sixteen-year-old drivers compared to older age groups. Another form of evidence is a quote from an expert, specifically Adrian Lund, president of the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, who affirms the effectiveness of raising the driving age in saving lives. Lastly, the passage offers relevant examples, mentioning New Jersey as the only state to have raised the driving age to seventeen and noting the reduction in teen fatalities linked to automobile accidents as a result.

Answer 2

I would say B) A quote from an expert

The question itself asks for evidence, not opinions or personal experience, therefore making the answer B. In the passage, there is evidence that they have provided that backs up their essay. "According to the National Highway Safety Administration, the rate of crashes, both fatal and nonfatal, for sixteen-year-old drivers is almost ten times the rate as that of drivers aged thirty to fifty-nine, as calculated per mile driven. " As well as a quote from an expert "The bottom line is that when we look at the research, raising the driving age saves lives."

Therefore, A Quote From An Expert

would be the right choice.

If the answer is incorrect, please let me know.