Question

A homeless man is accused of robbing a convenience store.

Which of the following should happen, and which cases(s) established this process?

A-The man should be informed of his right to an attorney (in re Gault) and to confront his accuser in court (Miranda v. Arizona).
B-The man should be informed of his rights (Miranda v. Arizona) and told his accuser's name (in re Gault).
C-The man should be informed of his rights (Miranda v. Arizona) and provided an attorney (Gideon v. Wainwright).
D-The man should receive official notice of charges (in re Gault) and be questioned with an attorney present (Miranda v. Arizona).

35 points!

Answer 1

Answer: C

Step-by-step explanation:

No matter what crime somone did, or is accused of they have to be informed of their rights (by law) and the right to an attorney.

Answer 2

c

they should be informed of his rights and be provided an attorney if they cant get one

Step-by-step explanation: