56.1k views
4 votes
TRUE OR FALSE PHOTO ATTACHED THANK YOU QUWESTION 215N THIS IS NOT FROM GRAD3D ASSIGNE,MNT

TRUE OR FALSE PHOTO ATTACHED THANK YOU QUWESTION 215N THIS IS NOT FROM GRAD3D ASSIGNE-example-1

1 Answer

0 votes

Solution:

Given:


\begin{gathered} P=\text{ \$2000} \\ r=2\text{ \%=}(2)/(100)=0.02 \\ n=12\text{ times (monthly compounding)} \\ t=1\text{year} \end{gathered}

When compounded monthly:

Using the compound interest formula;


\begin{gathered} A=P(1+(r)/(n))^(nt) \\ A=2000(1+(0.02)/(12))^(12*1) \\ A=\text{ \$2040.37} \\ \\ \\ \\ \text{The interest made is;} \\ I=A-P \\ I=2040.37-2000 \\ I=\text{ \$40.37} \\ \\ To\text{ the nearest whole number,} \\ I\approx\text{ \$40} \end{gathered}

When compounded weekly:

n = 52 times (assume 52 weeks make 1 year)

Using the compound interest formula;


\begin{gathered} A=P(1+(r)/(n))^(nt) \\ A=2000(1+(0.02)/(52))^(52*1) \\ A=\text{ \$2040.3}9 \\ \\ \\ \\ \text{The interest made is;} \\ I=A-P \\ I=2040.39-2000 \\ I=\text{ \$40.3}9 \\ \\ To\text{ the nearest whole number,} \\ I\approx\text{ \$40} \end{gathered}

From the calculations made for monthly and weekly compounding, it can be seen that the interest made in both cases is approximately equal.

Hence, $2000 invested at 2% compounded monthly DOES NOT earn more interest in a year than the same amount invested at 2% compounded weekly.

Therefore, the statement is FALSE.

User Tharsan
by
5.5k points