71.7k views
3 votes
In paragraph 3 of Texas v. Johnson Majority Opinion, Brennan paraphrases the opinion of Justice Holmes from another court case. What is the most likely reason Brennan might have for doing this?

In paragraph 3 of Texas v. Johnson Majority Opinion, Brennan paraphrases the opinion-example-1
User David Biga
by
5.7k points

1 Answer

0 votes

Answer:

D. Holmes provides authoritative evidence to support Brennan's views.

Step-by-step explanation:

By paraphrasing the decision of Justice Holmes from a previous court case, Holmes presents authoritative evidence in support of Brennan's position.

The most likely reason for this is evidence that cannot be contested. It is reliable and credible, supporting his position and conclusion. This demonstrates that you successfully defended your argument.

User PlushyObject
by
5.3k points