![6((1)/(2)+(2)/(3)+(3)/(4))](https://img.qammunity.org/2023/formulas/mathematics/college/p86lw1718zie3mv2wza5x73q3cqrqsqvqy.png)
With distribution:
![\begin{gathered} 6((1)/(2)+(2)/(3)+(3)/(4)) \\ =(6)(1)/(2)+(6)(2)/(3)+(6)(3)/(4) \\ =(6)/(2)+(12)/(3)+(18)/(4) \\ =((6\cdot6)+(4\cdot12)+(3\cdot18))/(12) \\ =(36+48+54)/(12) \\ =(138)/(12) \\ =(23)/(2) \end{gathered}](https://img.qammunity.org/2023/formulas/mathematics/college/bjkbk7c917oelgxoilvx0sfq4cavp5ehb9.png)
Without distribution:
![\begin{gathered} 6((1)/(2)+(2)/(3)+(3)/(4)) \\ =6\lbrack((6\cdot1)+(4\cdot2)+(3\cdot3))/(12)\rbrack \\ =6((6+8+9)/(12)) \\ =6((23)/(12)) \\ =(6\cdot23)/(12) \\ =(23)/(2) \end{gathered}](https://img.qammunity.org/2023/formulas/mathematics/college/m4gf6ki4gb9awz0g1xddjbhca596nge9bv.png)
It's easier to solve it without distribution because we're dealing with smaller numbers if we're not distributing 6 accross the terms. This makes carrying out the math more simple since we're looking at smaller numbers.