216k views
3 votes
Do you think that Winona LaDuke made an effective

argument for reducing light pollution? Why or why not?

User Pitel
by
4.1k points

2 Answers

4 votes

Answer: i think that Winona LaDuke made an effective argument when he started listing all the facts for reducing light pollution.

Explanation: pollution is destroying our economy and in the future we might all be sick from it.

User Brooks Moses
by
4.1k points
4 votes

Answer:

I think LaDuke makes an effective argument for reducing light pollution. She appeals to emotion by describing the beauty of fireflies and the harm done by light pollution. She establishes her credibility by finding common ground with the reader. She appeals to logic by presenting logical reasoning for her case. She also cites outside experts who provide strong support for her position. These all help make her argument convincing.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Natsumi
by
4.2k points