Question

The Supreme Court interpreted the Fifth Amendment in (3 points)

Gideon v. Wainwright to mean that accused people have a right to be informed of their rights

Gideon v. Wainwright to mean states must pay for counsel if the defendant cannot afford it

Miranda v. Arizona to mean states must pay for counsel if the defendant cannot afford it

Miranda v. Arizona to mean that accused people have a right to be informed of their rights

Answer 1

Answer: The answer is the last option, Miranda v. Arizona to mean that accused people have a right to be informed of their rights.