Answer
- Transformation 1 has no y-intercept
- Transformation 2 has a y-intercept of -2
SOLUTION
Problem Statement
We are told the PH of a pool is given by the function:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58185/58185ef545bd1abdf381b7ea9fd6dd5a9d66c39f" alt="p(t)=-\log 10t"
New chemicals transform this function and we are asked to find which transformation results in a y-intercept and we are also asked to show them graphically.
The translations are:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92bb5/92bb54cdfe5d48d9703e72e5508eef1ab6aa39bc" alt="\begin{gathered} p(t)+1=f(t)=-\text{log(}t)+1\text{ (Transformation 1)} \\ P(t+1)-1=f(t)=-\log 10(t+1)-1\text{ (Transformation 2)} \end{gathered}"
Method
Y-intercept
To find the y-intercepts of the graphs, we simply need to find the value of the p(t) when t = 0.
Plotting the graphs:
To plot the graphs, we shall apply a graphing calculator.
Solution
Transformation 1:
i. Y-intercept:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e32d3/e32d3f8bb2f49f6613bd643854806b6cd02713ab" alt="\begin{gathered} f(t)=-\log (t)+1 \\ put\text{ t=0} \\ f(0)=-\log (0)+1 \\ \\ \text{But we know that,} \\ \lim _(t\to0)\log (t)\to-\infty \\ \therefore\lim _(t\to0)-\log (t)\to\infty \\ \\ \therefore\lim _(t\to0)f(t)=\lim _(t\to0)(-\log (t)+1)\to\infty \end{gathered}"
Thus, we can see that the y-intercept of f(t) tends towards infinity and since infinity is not on the Real Number line, we can conclude that this transformation has no y-intercept
ii. Plotting Transformation 1:
The graph of Transformation 1 is given below:
Transformation 2:
i. Y-intercept:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7737d/7737d60fbbab447c7c8c64a41158bb8b41ae928d" alt="\begin{gathered} f(t)=-\log 10(t+1)-1 \\ \text{put t=0} \\ f(0)=-\log 10(0+1)-1 \\ f(0)=-\log 10-1 \\ \\ \text{ We know that }log10=1 \\ \therefore f(0)=-(1)-1=-1-1 \\ \\ f(0)=-2 \end{gathered}"
Thus, the y-intercept of this transformation exists and it is -2.
ii. Plotting Transformation 2
Final Answer
- Transformation 1 has no y-intercept
- Transformation 2 has a y-intercept of -2