68.8k views
0 votes
Do you think that winona laduke made an effective argument for reducing light pollution? why or why not?.

1 Answer

6 votes

Answer:

I think LaDuke makes an effective argument for reducing light pollution. She appeals to emotion by describing the beauty of fireflies and the harms done by light pollution. She establishes her credibility by finding common ground with the reader. She appeals to logic by presenting logical reasoning for her case. She also cites outside experts who provide strong support for her position. These all help make her argument convincing.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Guilherme Oliveira
by
3.7k points