42,934 views
4 votes
4 votes
Read the excerpt from Monster.

PETROCELLI
Then he must have lied, is that right?

O’BRIEN
Objection. The prosecution is soliciting an argument.

PETROCELLI
Withdrawn. Mr. Harmon, you say you weren’t at the drugstore anytime during the day of the robbery. Perhaps you would tell us where you were.

Read the excerpt from Monster.

PETROCELLI
Then he must have lied, is that right?

O’BRIEN
Objection. The prosecution is soliciting an argument.

PETROCELLI
Withdrawn. Mr. Harmon, you say you weren’t at the drugstore anytime during the day of the robbery. Perhaps you would tell us where you were.

Based on this dialogue, what can the reader infer?

A: This is Petrocelli's first time acting as the prosecuting attorney in a court of law.
B: Mr. Harmon knows where he was during the day of the robbery.
C: It is a rule of the court that a lawyer may not argue with someone during questioning.
D: Petrocelli has not been a trial lawyer as long as O'Brien has.

User Marc Pursals
by
2.8k points

2 Answers

14 votes
14 votes
C: It is a rule of the court that a lawyer may not argue with someone during questioning
User Ahsan Iqbal
by
2.5k points
21 votes
21 votes

Answer:

C: It is a rule of the court that a lawyer may not argue with someone during questioning.

Step-by-step explanation:

I feel like this is the correct answer because O'Brien objected to the question, and Petrocelli agreed with O'Brien. I feel like this is what is happening because Petrocelli withdrew that question and re-phrased it into a question that wasn't trying to lead Mr. Harmon into an argument.

User Trastle
by
2.4k points