148,959 views
10 votes
10 votes
I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. —Alexander Hamilton, the Federalist Paper 84 What point is Alexander Hamilton making?

A. The Constitution is stronger with a bill of rights.
B. A bill of rights should include only certain rights.
C. The Constitution did not need a bill of rights.
D. A bill of rights was necessary for ratification.

User Cnelson
by
2.8k points

2 Answers

26 votes
26 votes
A or C make the most sense
User Ernest Collection
by
3.0k points
25 votes
25 votes

Answer:

C makes the most sense with the wording

Step-by-step explanation:

User Tsenapathy
by
2.7k points