84.4k views
1 vote
RS2. Given: ZP ZQ andProve: PR=QRSupply the missing reason in Statement 1 of the proof of the the Converse of the Isosceles Triangle Theorem.Begin with isosceles APRQ with ZP ZQ. Construct RS, a bisector of ZPRQ.bisects ZPQR.R

RS2. Given: ZP ZQ andProve: PR=QRSupply the missing reason in Statement 1 of the proof-example-1
User Ignat
by
4.5k points

1 Answer

5 votes

We are given the following triangle:

We are given that:


\angle P=\angle Q

Since RS is a bisector this means that:


\angle PRS=\angle SRQ

Also, since S is a midpoint of PQ:


PS=SQ

By the reflexive property we have:


RS=RS

Since we have two pairs of congruent angles this means that:


\angle PSR=\angle QSR

Therefore, by SAS theorem of congruency:


\Delta PSR\cong\Delta QSR

Since the triangles are congruent this means that all of its sides are congruent too, therefore:


PR=QR

And thus we have concluded the proof.

RS2. Given: ZP ZQ andProve: PR=QRSupply the missing reason in Statement 1 of the proof-example-1
User Tangrammer
by
4.3k points