207k views
1 vote
I dont want you to answer question for me, i have already answered it as shown in the picture. I want you to let me know if i have provided an answer worth full marks and if not tell me how i could improve it

I dont want you to answer question for me, i have already answered it as shown in-example-1
User IgorCh
by
8.0k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Answer:


\begin{equation} √(3)-1,2 √(10) / 5, √(14), 3 √(2), √(19)+1,6 \end{equation}

Explanation:

Given the irrational numbers:


$3 √(2), √(3)-1, √(19)+1,6$, $2 √(10) / 5,√(14)$

In order to arrange the numbers from the least to the greatest, we convert each number into its decimal equivalent.


\begin{gathered} 3√(2)=3*1.414\approx4.242 \\ √(3)-1\approx1.732-1=0.732 \\ √(19)+1\approx4.3589+1=5.3589 \\ 6=6 \\ 2√(10)/5=2(3.1623)/5=1.2649 \\ √(14)=3.7147 \end{gathered}

Finally, sort these numbers in ascending order..


\begin{gathered} √(3)-1\approx1.732-1=0.732 \\ 2√(10)/5=2(3.1623)/5=1.2649 \\ √(14)=3.7147 \\ 3√(2)=3*1.414\approx4.242 \\ √(19)+1\approx4.3589+1=5.3589 \\ 6=6 \end{gathered}

The given numbers in ascending order is:


\begin{equation} √(3)-1,2 √(10) / 5, √(14), 3 √(2), √(19)+1,6 \end{equation}

Note: In your solution, you can make the conversion of each irrational begin on a new line.

User Lukasvo
by
8.3k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories