Answer:
The answer is D.
Step-by-step explanation:
Your question: I need help which one is it with a link.
My answer: D. It weakens urban districts made up of people of color
Before I explain why my answer is correct, let me provide a background on prison gerrymandering:
“Prison-based gerrymandering” is a practice whereby many states and local governments count incarcerated persons as residents of the areas where they are housed when election district lines are drawn. This practice distorts our democratic process by artificially inflating the population count—and thus, the political influence—of the districts where prisons and jails are located. As a result, the voting power of everyone living outside of those districts is weakened.
Prison-based gerrymandering makes a mockery of the principle of “one person, one vote,” which requires that election districts be comprised of roughly the same number of constituents so that every person receives the same level of representation. Unfortunately, prison-based gerrymandering gives added voting power to districts with prisons, violating this bedrock principle of political equality. Democracy at all levels of government suffers as a result. This problem is not limited to any particular region, and affects both rural and urban communities alike.
Undoubtedly, however, the communities that are the most thoroughly victimized by prison-based gerrymandering are urban communities of color—a result of the racial discrimination that infects our nation’s criminal justice policies.
Why is my answer correct?
Good question! It is correct because my answer is described in this paragraph: Undoubtedly, however, the communities that are the most thoroughly victimized by prison-based gerrymandering are urban communities of color—a result of the racial discrimination that infects our nation’s criminal justice policies.
Hope this helps! :D