334,923 views
11 votes
11 votes
In Cameron’s argument on the artistic value of video games, she wrote this introduction.

Roger Ebert once wrote an article titled, “Video Games Can Never Be Art.” In this article he wrote that no game is “worthy of comparison with the great dramatists, poets, filmmakers, novelists, and composers.” This may be true right now, but it’s inevitable that video games will rise to have just as much or more artistic importance than film, poetry, theater, and television. We’re witnessing the childhood phase of the dominant art form of the future.

Which of the following pieces of evidence supports her claim?

A .The museum of modern art now includes video games.

B .The video game industry is a multi-billion dollar industry.

C . Advances in video game graphics are happening faster and faster.

D. Video games are no longer the domain of children, as more and more adults are starting to enjoy them.

User Eeshaan
by
2.9k points

2 Answers

20 votes
20 votes
A sounds right to me
User Dcmbrown
by
3.1k points
11 votes
11 votes

Step-by-step explanation:

A, perhaps?

User Kabucey
by
2.8k points