30.7k views
3 votes
Why do you think paul revere would change crispus attuck's skin color

2 Answers

5 votes

Final answer:

While there is no direct evidence that Paul Revere changed Crispus Attucks's skin color in his depiction of the Boston Massacre, any such alteration would likely reflect the racial attitudes and propaganda goals of the time.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question you're asking relates to a historical event known as the Boston Massacre, during which Crispus Attucks, a man of Wampanoag and African descent, was killed. At some point, this historical event was depicted in artwork and propaganda, which could lead to alterations in representations for various reasons, including rallying sentiment or shaping public perception. If Paul Revere, who was known for his engraving depicting the Boston Massacre, had changed Crispus Attucks's skin color in any reproductions, it might have been due to the racial attitudes of the time or to emphasize certain narratives that would resonate with colonial viewers. However, there is no specific historical evidence that Paul Revere altered the skin color of Crispus Attucks in his famous engraving. The subject is contingent upon understanding the historical context of the period, including the role of propaganda and the complexities of race relations during the buildup to the American Revolution.

User Sve
by
4.6k points
2 votes

Answer:

Crispus Attucks, a sailor of mixed African and Indigenous ancestry, died in Boston on March 5, 1770, after British soldiers fired two musket balls into his chest. His death and that of four other men at the hands of the 29th Regiment became known as the Boston Massacre

Step-by-step explanation:

I don't think Paul Revere ever changed Crispus Attucks's skin color.

User Jorgy
by
4.6k points