Final answer:
The manufacturer is usually the party best able to pay for injuries in a strict liability case.
Step-by-step explanation:
In a strict liability case, the manufacturer is usually the party best able to pay for injuries. Strict liability holds manufacturers responsible for any injuries or damages caused by their products, regardless of fault. This means that even if the manufacturer took all precautions and followed all regulations, they can still be held liable for injuries caused by their product.
For example, if a person is injured by a defective product, they can file a lawsuit against the manufacturer seeking compensation for their injuries. The manufacturer, being the party responsible for designing, manufacturing, and distributing the product, is typically in a better financial position to pay for any resulting injuries.
On the other hand, the injured party (plaintiff) is the one who suffered harm and is seeking compensation for their injuries. While they may receive a financial award if they win the case, they might not have the financial resources to pay for extensive medical bills or other damages themselves.