Register
In 1993, a wisconsin law that allowed lengthier sentences for hate crimes was challenged as a violation of the first amendment. How did the court rule?.
234k views
4 votes
In 1993, a wisconsin law that allowed lengthier sentences for hate crimes was challenged as a violation of the first amendment. How did the court rule?.

User Khangharoth
by
4.5k points

2 Answers

5 votes
What motherbrain said lol
User Shawn Shroyer
by
4.7k points
6 votes

Answer: The Court ruled that restricting speech specifically because it targeted people based on race was unconstitutionally underinclusive under the First Amendment.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Jatrim
by
5.3k points
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

5.3m questions

6.9m answers

Other Questions

Great Britain is an example of a: O A. Dictatorship O B. Republic with unitary system O C. Constitution monarchy with parliamentary system D. Oligarchy with federalist system​
Is there a correlation between the size of an empire and the amount of power it holds in the world?
What was the effect of the rise of the mass media during the 1920s? A) It led to increased membership in labor unions. B) It contributed to the development of a national culture. C) It caused mass migration
Thomas Edison Is considered one of the greatest investors because he was responsible for
Name African Amer 1. What was the Middle Passage in the Slave Trade?
Link Copied!