175k views
0 votes
Both "Point: Lewis and Clark Are Heroes of American History" and

"Counterpoint: Lewis and Clark Were Too Focused on Individual
Success" discuss the history and legacy of Lewis and Clark. How
effectively do the two passages use the same information to
achieve different ends?

User Gent
by
3.9k points

2 Answers

7 votes

Final answer:

The two passages offer contrasting interpretations of the Lewis and Clark expedition, each using historical evidence to argue their perspective on whether they are American heroes or were too self-centered. One highlights their accomplishments and contributions to U.S. expansion, while the other scrutinizes their individualistic focus and its consequences.

Step-by-step explanation:

The effectiveness of the passages "Point: Lewis and Clark Are Heroes of American History" and "Counterpoint: Lewis and Clark Were Too Focused on Individual Success" in using the same information for different purposes can be evaluated by examining how each passage interprets the facts and presents their narrative. These two contrasting views of the Lewis and Clark expedition use historical records, such as journal entries, maps, and the directives given by President Thomas Jefferson to craft their arguments. The effectiveness lies in the rhetorical strategies the passages employ, such as emphasizing the explorers' contribution to expanding geographical knowledge and solidifying the United States' claims in one, while the other might critique their motives or the impacts of their journey on native populations.

The successes and challenges faced by Lewis and Clark, as documented in their journals and reflected in their maps, serve as evidence for both arguments. One passage might celebrate the expedition's achievements in mapping uncharted territory, establishing relations with Native American tribes, and cataloging new flora and fauna. Contrastingly, the other passage could use the same information to argue that the focus on personal accolades and ambitions overshadowed more significant issues, such as the ethical implications of their interactions with indigenous peoples.

Ultimately, each passage stands as an example of how historical facts can be interpreted in multiple ways to support different perspectives, demonstrating the power of selective emphasis and narrative construction to achieve various ends in historical discourse.

User Abdul Hannan Ijaz
by
3.4k points
2 votes

Answer:

the answer is they both saved america

Step-by-step explanation:

User Juri Noga
by
3.4k points