Register
Do you think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted? Or do you think a lesser burden of proof, like the preponderance of evidence in needed in civil cases,
508,344 views
8 votes
8 votes
Do you think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted? Or do you think a lesser burden of proof, like the preponderance of evidence in needed in civil cases, is more appropriate?

explain your reasoning

User WiatroBosy
by
3.0k points

1 Answer

23 votes
23 votes

Answer:

yeah because who's to say that we are guilty with the proof

User Siyb
by
2.7k points
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

1.6m questions

2.0m answers

Other Questions

What if . . . you were a judge and you had a repeat offender for purse snatching in your courtroom? This individual has already been on probation and home incarceration. The individual has also spent a
What type of searches and seizures are protected against under the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution? unreasonable reasonable probable cause frisk
The major goal of __is to achieve a just and orderly society through a practical emphasis on social justice?
Chủ thể nào bắt buộc là cá nhân đủ điều kiện theo quy định pháp luật: a. Cổ đông sáng lập công ty cổ phần c. Thành viên hợp danh b. Thành viên của công ty hợp danh d. Thành viên công ty TNHH
mention a short description of make an observation , ask a question , do a background resaerch related to scientific learning .​
Link Copied!