522,011 views
11 votes
11 votes
In a trial, an expert witness uses the conservation of momentum to demonstrate which initial velocities would give the final states that occurred in the accident. Can using the conservation of momentum be justified in this case? Yes, because momentum is conserved in all collisions. No, momentum is only conserved in elastic collisions which this is not. No, energy is always conserved, but momentum is only sometimes conserved. Yes, because momentum is conserved in inelastic collisions which all car accidents are.​

User Bubismark
by
3.0k points

2 Answers

15 votes
15 votes

Answer:

Yes, because momentum is conserved in all inelastic collisions which all car accidents are

Explanation:

What is law of conservation of momentum?

It states that In a equilibrium the initial momentum is equal to to the final momentum of the body

Or


\\ \sf\longmapsto \Delta P=P

User ShadowGod
by
2.9k points
18 votes
18 votes

Answer:

• Yes, because momentum is conserved in all collisions.

Explanation:

→ Elastic collision, inelastic collision and perfectly inelastic collision, linear momentum is conserved assuming no external forces acting on the system.

In elastic collision


\dashrightarrow \: { \tt{m _(1)u _(1) + m _(2) u_(2) = m_(1)v_(1) + m_(2)v_(2)}} \\

In inelastic collision


\dashrightarrow \: { \tt{m_(1)u_(1) + m_(2)u_(2) = (m_(1) + m_(2))v}}

User Kamalbanga
by
3.5k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.