Question

As soon as the group sat down to review his work, Angel stood up and explained how and why he had decided to write his story from the first-person point of view. Was this an appropriate choice?

No. Writers should listen and take notes, not explain themselves.

Yes. It’s appropriate for the writer to explain his motivation.

No. Writers should wait until the middle of the review to explain themselves.

Yes. The writer should be able to speak whenever he wishes.

Answer 1

It is appropriate for a writer to explain the choice of narrative view when reviewing their work, as it provides context and aids in receiving more relevant feedback.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the context of a group review, it is appropriate for the writer to explain his motivation for choosing a particular narrative perspective. Angel chose the first-person point of view, which allows the narrator to tell the story directly from his own perspective. This choice empowers the narrator to influence the reader's perceptions of other characters and events, potentially introducing bias that might be intentional for narrative effect. For instance, the narrator's description of a character as not very intelligent might reflect the narrator's own opinions rather than the objective truth. Therefore, the first-person narrative point of view necessitates readers to look for additional evidence to support the narrator's claims.

Authors have options for narrating a literary work and explaining the reasoning behind these choices can provide valuable insight into their creative process. Engaging with peer feedback is a crucial part of developing a story, but providing initial context can set the stage for a more productive critique. This explanation can help the group understand the author's intent and offer more targeted feedback.