103k views
0 votes
Is this how you solve this (finding the inverse)

Is this how you solve this (finding the inverse)-example-1
User Gregtzar
by
8.3k points

1 Answer

2 votes

There are a couple ways to go about this.

By definition of inverse function, if
j^(-1) exists, then


j\left(j^(-1)(x)\right) = x

All this means is that if you provide some input
x, plug it into
j^(-1)(x), then plug that into
j(x), you end up recovering the original input
x that you started with.

We can also do this in the opposite direction, so


j^(-1)(j(x)) = x

So now if
j(x) is invertible, then


j(x) = -\frac23 x - 9 \implies j\left(j^(-1)(x)\right) = -\frac23 j^(-1)(x) - 9 = x

Solve for
j^(-1).


-\frac23 j^(-1)(x) - 9 = x


\frac23 j^(-1)(x) = -x - 9


j^(-1)(x) = -\frac32 (x+9)


\boxed{j^(-1)(x) = -\frac32 x - \frac{27}2}

Another way to do it is by algebraically substituting
x within the definition of
j(x)

Starting with the given definition


j(x) = -\frac23 x - 9

we replace
x with some new expression in a new variable
y that makes the right side reduce to just
y. To demonstrate, if we multiply
-\frac23 x by
-\frac32, we end up with a coefficient of 1. So let
x=-\frac32 y. Then


j\left(-\frac32 y\right) = -\frac23 \left(-\frac32 y\right) - 9 = y - 9

As you can see, this doesn't completely reduce to
y, so we're not done. To adjust for this, we just add 9 to
y, so our ultimate substitution is
x=-\frac32(y+9). Then


j\left(-\frac32 (y+9)\right) = -\frac23 \left(-\frac32 (y+9)\right) - 9 = (y+9) - 9 = y

Now applying
j^(-1) to both sides,


j^(-1)\left(j\left(-\frac32 (y+9)\right)\right) = j^(-1)(y)


\implies \boxed{j^(-1)(y) = -\frac32 y - \frac{27}2}

(we can freely swap out
y for
x at this point)

Yet another way, since the function here is quite simple, we can just think about the action of
j on a given number
x - multiply it by -2/3, and subtract 9.


x \mapsto -\frac23 x \mapsto -\frac23x - 9 = j(x)

The inverse operation undoes this, so given some number
j(x), we recover
x by adding the additive inverse of -9, or 9, then multiplying the whole result by the multiplicative inverse of -2/3, or -3/2.


j(x) \mapsto j(x) + 9 \mapsto -\frac32(j(x) + 9) \mapsto -\frac32 j(x) - \frac{27}2 = x

You seem to be using some version of this method. You made the mistake of thinking the "multiply by -3/2" step applies only to
j(x), and not
j(x) + 9.

User Tiara
by
7.5k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories