Question

10) Considering both passages, which draws a logical conclusion?

A) Incidents of bear-inflicted human injuries can never be avoided.
B) Incidents of bear-inflicted human injuries can always be avoided.
C) While visiting the Yellowstone National Parks, tourists are likely to see grizzly bears,
but not to be injured by them.
D) Taking cautionary measures is wise, but visitors to Yellowstone National Parks are
unlikely to be injured by grizzly bears or black bears.

Answer 1

Considering both passages, the logical conclusion is D) Taking cautionary measures is wise, but visitors to Yellowstone National Parks are unlikely to be injured by grizzly bears or black bears.

Step-by-step explanation:

The passages emphasize the importance of cautionary measures when encountering bears in Yellowstone National Parks. While the likelihood of encountering bears is acknowledged, the conclusion drawn is that, with proper precautions, visitors are unlikely to be injured by grizzly bears or black bears.

This conclusion aligns with the overall tone of the passages, which emphasizes both the presence of bears and the significance of safety measures. It strikes a balance between acknowledging the potential risk and advocating for responsible behavior to mitigate that risk.

The reasoning behind this conclusion lies in the information presented in both passages. The texts discuss the prevalence of bears in Yellowstone, the potential risks associated with bear encounters, and the effectiveness of precautions in minimizing those risks.

Therefore, the logical conclusion is that, by taking necessary precautions, visitors can enjoy their experience in Yellowstone without significant danger from bear-inflicted injuries.

So correct option is D) Taking cautionary measures is wise, but visitors to Yellowstone National Parks are unlikely to be injured by grizzly bears or black bears.