Final answer:
Eduardo can effectively appeal to pathos by highlighting the emotional consequences of the Mueller investigation, particularly on Trump's associates, and the distress caused by a potential blurring of moral lines in American politics.
Step-by-step explanation:
To effectively use pathos in his essay about the Mueller investigation and its impact on Donald Trump, Eduardo could include a sentence that highlights the emotional weight of the investigation's findings and consequences, particularly how it affected those close to Trump. A compelling sentence might read: "Through the course of the Mueller investigation, trusted associates of the President like Paul Manafort and Michael Cohen faced serious legal repercussions, cultivating a somber reflection of loyalty and integrity within the halls of power." This sentence not only provides factual information about the investigation's impact on Trump's inner circle but also aims to elicit emotions of concern and melancholy over the personal and political turmoil that ensued.
Additionally, incorporating quotes or details from the investigation that show indictments and convictions of key figures would strengthen the emotional appeal. For example: "The conviction of Roger Stone, a long-time confidant of the President, marked a distressing chapter in American politics, one that blurred the lines between allegiance and legality."
Finally, questioning the motivations behind Trump's actions or the investigation could provoke emotional responses from readers. A sentence like "Despite fervent denials of collusion and cries of a 'witch hunt,' the relentless wave of indictments painted a picture of a campaign fraught with dubious alliances and moral ambiguity," could further appeal to the reader's sense of fairness and justice.