464,542 views
34 votes
34 votes
After many years of touring, Chang and Eng decided to retire and live a normal life. The two bought land in North Carolina and became American citizens. They eventually married sisters, Sally and Adelaide Yates, and all together had 22 children. In 1874, Eng woke one morning to discover that his brother had died from a blood clot in the night. Eng had been in better health than his brother, but he died less than three hours later. Doctors could find no explanation for Eng’s death.

What is the best inference to make, based on this passage?

A- Eng may have died of sorrow, missing his brother.
B- The sisters wanted to live apart after their husbands died.
C- Doctors did not look hard enough to find how Eng died.
D- Chang and Eng’s wives probably died soon after.

User Ilanchezhian
by
2.7k points

2 Answers

21 votes
21 votes

Final answer:

The best inference is that Eng died of sorrow after his brother Chang's death, indicating a deeply emotional and potentially psychosomatic response to loss.

Step-by-step explanation:

The best inference to make, based on the passage provided, is that Eng may have died of sorrow, missing his brother Chang after his sudden death. While cases of people dying shortly after a loved one have been anecdotally reported through history, these instances often elude concrete medical explanations. However, historical accounts and narratives, as in the examples provided, often suggest a profound emotional bond can significantly impact an individual's wellbeing following the loss of a close relative or loved one.

User IDDQD
by
2.9k points
23 votes
23 votes

Answer:a a or c

Step-by-step explanation:

User Natejms
by
2.9k points