36.2k views
4 votes
Some historians believe that there were great benefits for enslaved people becoming a part of Mesopotamian households. How does this theory compare with other historians’ thoughts?

Other historians believe that the benefits were not similar to the benefits free members of a household had.

Other historians believe that enslaved people were treated more like servants.

Other historians believe that great benefits came from owning businesses or selling their own goods.

Other historians believe that being accepted into a poor household could help foreign captives move up in society.

User Sdabrutas
by
3.7k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Answer:

Other historians believe that the benefits were not similar to the benefits free members of a household had.

Step-by-step explanation:

took the quick check and got it right so this is 100% the correct answer

Δ

the one on the top is wrong so don't do that one

User Peter Becker
by
4.0k points